Windows Vista Unstable

Uploaded on Sep 28, 2008 / 52 views / 56 impressions / 3 comments

Description

Hehehehe
Try ending CSRSS, Nice touch Microshit :)

Tags

  • suck
  • unstable
  • fail
  • vista

11 comments

1. gervish

Sep 28, 2008

Retarded.

2. MacUnderground

Sep 29, 2008

Running Vista on an ancient computer that can't even do Aero... It is your cheap ass computer that is unstable, not Vista. And 'most virus filled'? Vista is more secure than XP ever was. If you have viruses, perhaps you should stop downloading pirated software and jacking off to porn.

PCessna

Sep 30, 2008

Wow, You're a little nuublet. This is VIRTUALBOX. Good, Learned something new? Now stop commenting on my videos you little fuck.

Try ending it. Simple and short, Microsoft just opening on hundreds of new virus possibilities with Vista. It is not close to as secure, UAC proves it. Just because of administrative rights fix doesn't mean theres another 1,000,000 issues again. And how can you assume I even Jack off to anything? You're just being stupid.

My PC can barley run vista, and it is 3.00GHZ and 2.00GB ram. I'm trying my best to get Hard Disk controller drivers for XP.

MacUnderground

Oct 02, 2008

Oh, and sorry about the porn comment, I didn't realize you were so young.

PCessna

Oct 03, 2008

You don't even know my age. Just leave because you're making yourself look pathetic.

MacUnderground

Oct 05, 2008

Your age is listed as 12 on your channel. No I don't know if it is correct of course, you could be lying and have put in anything. But you talk like a kid and I don't think it's cool to mess around like that with kids. That stuff is for adults only.

3. MacUnderground

Oct 02, 2008

Wow a virtualbox, and you wonder why you can't get Vista to run with only 2GB of RAM... Who's the 'nuublet'? That would be you, (whatever the fuck nuublet means anyway.)

This quote is from the winner of the $10K hack challenge, who gained root access of a Mac in less than 30 min:
"I have found the code quality, at least in terms of security, to be much better overall in Vista than Mac OS X 10.4. It is obvious from observing affected components in security patches that Microsoft’s Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) has resulted in fewer vulnerabilities in newly-written code."

Macs running OS X are always the first to fall in security hacking challenges when pitted against Vista. The fact that no one WANTS to attack your pitiful Mac, does not mean that it is more secure. Go do some research on the security topic before to spout ridiculous quotes straight from an Apple Commercial.

When you stop worshiping ViciousRetard119, I will stop commenting on your videos.

PCessna

Oct 03, 2008

Show me one place I worshiped ViciousDave, I added him as a friend. PERIOD. Go fuck yourself like I know you do.

MacUnderground

Oct 05, 2008

I would give links to the worshiping comments you left on his videos, but he took the videos down, so I can't give the world proof. But I know what you said, and you know what you said and that is all that matters. You didn't JUST add him as a friend. You drooled and left retarded comments on ALL his videos about how good they are, which is stupid. That goofy fat ass couldn't make a good video if someone else did it for him.

MacUnderground

Oct 05, 2008

Funny how you have nothing to say about OSX getting hacked to shit security wise when compared to Vista... And you thought your system was so secure, just cause Apple told you so. Dumbass.

PCessna

Oct 05, 2008

Why would I have anything to say about Leopard when I can almost guarantee apple has fixed the security flaws? Microsoft will never fix shit. :)

Post a comment

Allowed tags: <a> <b> <br> <u> <i>