THE IMAGINARY MECHANISM OF DARWINISM Favorite

This website uses Adobe® Flash™ Player 9
Download Flash Now

If you are using Internet Explorer, you will need to restart your browser after installing Flash.
Adobe and Flash are registered trademarks of Adobe Systems incorporated. All rights reserved.

7 views • Uploaded December 11, 2007

Religion is a DOGMA os WAY before the 19th century ...

Calling Evolution an 'imaginary' mechanism brings to question - how much more imaginary is the concept of 'god'? Maybe the proof of evolution is not yet complete - but there is FAR more evidence to support the theory of Evolution than of some whimsical fancy of a 'god'

Again, there is FAR more proof supporting Evolution than of some 'god' being. Question: Why do you WANT or NEED to belive there is a god? You are strong enough to live very well without the need to believe in some unknown higher being.

Genetic mutations are constantly and randomly occuring - by chance. Think of siamese twins, born stuck together - or chickens with 2 heads - or other naturally occuring genetic mutations. Mutations do occur. Most of them do not help the animal to succeed more. Some just might. Those mutations will live on

Evlolution is not about NEW species - it is about PROGRESSION - a gradual, very slow change over a massive time. Probably a longer time than most people can imagine or conceive - clearly a longer time than this narator talking can conceive ...

If only half of 1 percent of mutations are beneficial, that is all it takes, over a massively long time, for those mutations to live on and be passed on to offspring.

The claim that 'mutations only harm the living being' is totally illogical - it is based on only half the story. It used to be believed that black swans did not exist because no-one had ever seen them. It was held as 'fact' that black swans did not - could not - exist for this reason. Then when Australia was discovered ... black swans were discovered - so black swans do exist. In the same way, you cannot logically prove something does not exist by the fact that you have never seen it. The same argument applies logically to having never seen successful mutations, and having never seen god; you can't prove either exists or does not exist by the fact that you have not seen it.

... daydreaming like ... believing their might be a god - what a nice fantasy ...

Comments Feed